LEE, Redbourn, 1840
September 2001
Also who did the crime? There were many John Lee's some of which are John Lea c May 13, 1804 s/o John Lee & Sarah;
John Lea c Mar. 24, 1822 s/o John Lee & Ann
or perhaps John Lee married to Mary Palmer
1830. Was there a write up in the local newspaper, or a write up
anywhere. Which John Lee went
missing?
Do you have any information available to you that I don't have, or does any
reader know the answer?
While we know the age of the John Lee who
died we don't know the age of the one who killed him - which really opens up
the possibilities. (Knowing how names run in the family it could have involved
father and son.) The only John Lee in Redbourn at the time of the 1851 census was John Lea (57, agricultural labourer) living at the
Common with his wife Mary (54, plaiter),
and unmarried children Mary (20, plaiter),
Hannah (18, plaiter) and James (13, farm boy) - all born at Redbourn,
I rarely get to Hertford (about 70 miles away there and back) but on Tuesday I had the chance to look in at HALS for a couple of hours to sort out a list of things, including your query. Unfortunately there is no relevant reference to John Lee in the printed calendars of court records. They do not have copies of the "Hertfordshire Mercury" for the relevant but they do have the "The Reformer and Herts, Beds, Bucks, Essex, Cambridge and Middlesex Advertiser" where most of the "local" news comes from Hertfordshire and much of the rest from Bedfordshire. Parts of it were quite difficult to read, but I could not see any references to the inquest in February 1840 - or in fact to Redbourn. Not a good omen - but you could approach HALS for a more thorough look.
We don't know whether the John Lee who was killed was married - but if so you might find his widow with young children in the 1841 census - so a check of the microfilm could also help you with other Lees in the area.
If you can add to the information given above tell me.